08.11 Planning on Account Nominal by Cost Center

08.11 Planning on Account Nominal by Cost Center

Where an organisation needs to plan by cost centre, division, department, or project — as well as by account — you add more dimensions to the down axis of the input template. This is the most granular approach and gives maximum reporting flexibility, at the cost of greater data-entry effort and more careful template design.

Here is a video, or read below.

When to use this approach

Step 1 - Setup the data-entry report

  1. The setup is the same as Account Nominal planning, with one change: in the Rows / Columns dialog, each dimension to be planned against is added to the down axis alongside Account.

    In Epicor, typical combinations are:

    • Division + Account: add Segment2 and Account to the down axis.

    • Division + Department + Account: add Segment2, Segment3, and Account.

    • Full GL Account dimension: a prebuilt Epicor dimension that combines Segment1, Segment2, and Segment3 into a single composite field. Use this for simplicity over flexibility.

  2. Run the report.

    Confirm Segment code combinations appear in rows, periods across the top, and that actuals are populating where expected.

    image

  3. If you remember from 08.03

When the first figure is submitted to a scenario, FastClose records which dimensions were used. Every subsequent submission to that scenario must use the same dimensions. If the first submission is made at Account code level, a later submission from a template that includes a Department dimension will be rejected.

  1. Verify submission cells are yellow (see 08.06 if they are not).

  2. Save the report with a clear name — for example: Budget FY2026 — Detailed Input.

Step 2 - Entering data in Excel

Follow the same process as described in 08.07

Now try the downloadable exercises below:

LINK HERE

Your feedback helps us do better, to fill in a short survey on this tutorial, click here.

Move on to 0812 - Balance Sheet Planning (Advanced)

Powered By